In-to-Out but Still Slicing? Check Face and Contact

Swinging in to out but still slicing? Check face-to-path, playing-hand signs, driver strike location and measurement alignment before adding more path.

In to Out Swing Editorial · Published · Updated

An in-to-out path alone does not guarantee a draw.

You can swing in to out and still slice when the face is open to the path for your playing hand. Driver contact away from the center can also complicate the relationship. Check face, path and strike from the same shot before assuming that an outward path should have cured the slice.

Slice relationship checker

Interactive calculator↗

Check whether the face-to-path gap suggests fade curvature for your playing hand.

Slice relationship checkerThe diagram updates from your entries. Exact results are listed below.2.0 °
Face to path2.00 °
Golfer-relative fade gap2.00 °
Golfer-relative outward path4.00 °

Centered-contact fade tendency. Check contact before assigning a cause.

A positive golfer-relative gap suggests fade curvature only in the simplified centered-contact model.

01 / Slices, fades and double crosses

Why an in-to-out swing can still slice

An in-to-out path can coexist with a fade or slice tendency. For a right-handed example, +4° path and +6° face create +2° face to path. The club is moving outward, but the face points farther right than that movement. Centered contact therefore suggests rightward curvature in the simplified model.

The checker also accounts for handedness. It converts the signed gap into a golfer-relative fade gap, so a left-handed player does not have to interpret right-handed labels. Positive golfer-relative values indicate the fade side; they are not a severity scale.

For a left-hander, the corresponding fade example is a −4° path and −6° face: the raw gap is −2°, while the golfer-relative fade gap is positive. Naming the hand avoids treating every positive raw gap as a slice for everyone.

Explore this relationship↗
Why an in-to-out swing can still sliceThe diagram updates from your entries. Exact results are listed below.2.0 °
Face to path2.00 °
Golfer-relative fade gap2.00 °
Golfer-relative outward path4.00 °

Centered-contact fade tendency. Check contact before assigning a cause.

A positive golfer-relative gap suggests fade curvature only in the simplified centered-contact model.

02 / Slices, fades and double crosses

Investigate a result that contradicts the model

If the entered relationship suggests a draw but the ball repeatedly fades, confirm that the data belongs to the same shot and reference line. Then inspect contact. Off-center driver impact can change curvature, making a two-angle model insufficient to describe the result.

Do not automatically move the path farther outward. That may enlarge the face-to-path separation in one direction or create a different start-line problem. Keep three observations together: the impact mark, the starting direction and the curve. The contradiction itself is useful evidence about what needs checking.

Check whether the path is measured or inferred from a rehearsal video. A club that appears behind you before impact does not prove an outward impact direction. If the measurement is valid and the flight still conflicts with the centered-contact model, the impact mark becomes especially useful evidence.

Explore this relationship↗
Investigate a result that contradicts the modelThe diagram updates from your entries. Exact results are listed below.2.0 °
Face to path2.00 °
Golfer-relative fade gap2.00 °
Golfer-relative outward path4.00 °

Centered-contact fade tendency. Check contact before assigning a cause.

A positive golfer-relative gap suggests fade curvature only in the simplified centered-contact model.

03 / Slices, fades and double crosses

Test a focused correction instead of a universal fix

Choose the part of the evidence you can test most directly. A face-delivery question needs reliable face and path readings; a strike question needs a repeatable contact record. Use a small set of manageable shots and change one condition so that the comparison remains interpretable.

A single straighter shot is encouraging but cannot establish that the cause has been fixed. Look for a pattern across the set and another session. The driver strike tool and face-to-path solver provide the next steps without claiming that every slice comes from the same mechanical fault.

A face-control experiment and a contact experiment need different feedback. Track the face gap when working on delivery; classify strike location when working on impact. Keep the other observations in view so a straighter shot is not mistaken for a repeatable fix simply because two errors happened to offset.

Put the idea into practice

  1. Confirm that the entered face and path are from one shot and use the same target line.
  2. Select your hand, calculate the gap and compare the expected tendency with observed curvature.
  3. Check strike location and alignment before testing one delivery or contact change.

Will swinging farther in-to-out stop my slice?

It changes the face-to-path relationship only if the face is considered too. Your face and contact may also change during a real swing. First identify the repeated gap and strike pattern; more outward path is not a universal cure.

Can driver contact make the ball curve differently from the two angles?

Yes. Off-center driver impact can affect curvature. This checker models a centered-contact tendency and does not apply a gear-effect correction, so retain the impact mark when investigating a mismatch.

Explore this relationship↗
Test a focused correction instead of a universal fixThe diagram updates from your entries. Exact results are listed below.2.0 °
Face to path2.00 °
Golfer-relative fade gap2.00 °
Golfer-relative outward path4.00 °

Centered-contact fade tendency. Check contact before assigning a cause.

A positive golfer-relative gap suggests fade curvature only in the simplified centered-contact model.

How to use the results and check the calculation

Start with the labeled example, then replace the inputs with your own observations or chosen comparison values. The controls show the accepted units and range. Changing a value updates the outputs and the linked diagrams throughout this article; each section also lets you adjust one part of the same example.

Face-to-path gap = face − path; golfer-relative fade gap = gap × hand sign.

A positive golfer-relative gap suggests fade curvature only in the simplified centered-contact model. Where a visual compares values, it keeps matching units together. Exact numbers appear below the drawing so a schematic scale cannot be mistaken for a measured result.

Explore this relationship↗
Check the calculationThe diagram updates from your entries. Exact results are listed below.2.0 °
Face to path2.00 °
Golfer-relative fade gap2.00 °
Golfer-relative outward path4.00 °

Centered-contact fade tendency. Check contact before assigning a cause.

A positive golfer-relative gap suggests fade curvature only in the simplified centered-contact model.

Keep learning